State v. Stanley

Decided 1998-11-18

Cited by 101 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CATHELL, Judge. This case requires us to examine a criminal defendant’s constitutional right to compulsory process under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment and the former statute relating to the offense of assault with intent to maim, disfigure, or disable. 1 Because the State’s Attorney’s comment to the prosecutorial witness about…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.