State v. Simpson

Decided 1998-02-23

Cited by 263 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

REID, Justice, dissenting. I dissent because the majority’s decision represents a further erosion of constitutional protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. I would .find that the investigative stop in this ease violates the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution of Tennessee, and reverse the conviction. In State v. Pulley, </…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.