State v. Sharp

Decided 1980-09-03

Cited by 102 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

BISTLINE, Justice, dissenting. It may be of some solace to the defendant, Charles Sharp, to know that at one time a majority of the Court were of the opinion that he was entitled to a new trial. In the appellate process, as with juries, minds do change and I stand alone in my opinion that Mr. Sharp has not yet had the fair trial to which all are entitled. Defendant may rest assured that there has been full dis…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.