State v. Scott

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1988-06-09

Cited by 570 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Utter, J. (concurring) — I agree with the majority's holding to affirm the conviction. However, I reject the majority's reasoning, which would allow defendants to stand convicted where the jury is not instructed on technical definitions of crucial terms. The majority holds that it is constitutional error to fail to instruct the jury on elements of a crime but it is not constitutional error to fail to define…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.