State v. Schlee

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 2008-02-20

Cited by 246 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Cupp, J., concurring in judgment only. {¶ 15} I concur in the judgment of the court. I agree that the Civ.R. 60(B) motion filed by Schlee ought to have been filed as a petition for postconviction relief because Crim.R. 35 prescribes the attendant procedures. {¶ 16} However, I do not believe that trial courts — and specifically the trial court in this case — should “recast” motions that…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.