Sanders, J. ¶34 (concurring in part and dissenting in part) — I concur with the majority that Glen Schaler’s conviction should be reversed because the jury instructions for the harassment statute were required to and did not include the mens rea element. ¶35 However, I dissent from the majority to the extent it remands this case for a new trial. A new trial is unnecessary because, as a matter of law, none of…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.