State v. Ross

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 2004-08-12

Cited by 167 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Bridge, J. These defendants principally assert that the State’s failure to prove at sentencing that their prior out-of-state and/or federal convictions were comparable to Washington State felony crimes, and thus properly included in their offender scores, constitutes legal error. They contend that pursuant to our decision in In re Personal Restraint of Goodwin, <a href="/opinion/49…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.