WOMACK, J., filed a concurring opinion in which KELLER, and KEASLER, JJ., joined. I agree with what the Court has done, but I wish we would change what we say. No matter how many times we have said it, there is no justification for us to “assume that the trial court made implicit findings of fact that support its ruling,” ante at 856. There is no more reason to assume that the t…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.