State v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 2015-06-24

Cited by 702 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

O’Donnell, J. {¶ 1} The Eighth District Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, concluded that “where it is clear from a facial review of the charges that the offenses may be allied, even when facts necessary to determine the conduct of the offender are missing,” 2013-Ohio-3235 , <span…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.