State v. Rimmasch

Decided 1989-05-17

Cited by 202 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

HALL, Chief Justice (concurring and dissenting): I agree that the trial court erred in admitting the opinion evidence of the State’s expert witness. However, I am not persuaded that the error was other than harmless. The case was tried to the court, sitting without a jury, and the evidence of the 17-year-old victim, standing alone, is sufficient to meet the…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.