State v. Raber

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 2012-12-05

Cited by 116 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

O’Connor, C.J., dissenting. {¶ 28} As a matter of law, the sexually oriented offense for which Kyle Raber was convicted was nonconsensual. For that reason, the trial court had no business engaging in an evidentiary hearing on the issue of consent. {¶ 29} Raber was convicted of sexual imposition in violation of R.C. 2907.06(A)(1), which prohibit…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.