State v. Post

Decided 1994-02-18

Cited by 131 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

TOMLJANOVICH, Justice (dissenting in part and concurring in part). I believe the trial court acted within its discretion in excluding a witness’s lay opinion that the victim was the aggressor; therefore, I dissent from that portion of the opinion. Rulings on evidentiary matters rest within the sound discretion of the trial court. State v. Olkon, <span…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.