State v. O'Dell

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1989-08-23

Cited by 173 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Wright, J. The state of Ohio is appealing the reversal of O’Dell’s sentence, while O’Dell appeals her conviction and raises four propositions of law. For the reasons that follow, we affirm defendant’s conviction but reverse the court of appeals in part and reinstate the trial court’s sentence. I In the first of four propositions of law, defendant urges that her conviction was obtained in viol…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.