State v. O'CONNELL

Decided 1979-02-21

Cited by 118 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

McCORMICK, Justice (concurring specially). I concur in the result and in all but division VI of the court’s opinion. I am unable to agree with the basis of division VI because I do not believe defendant alerted the trial court to the ground of his objection to the circumstantial evidence instruction. Under rule 196, R.C.P., an objection to the court’s final draft of instructions or its fai…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.