State v. Newell

Decided 2006-02-10

Cited by 227 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CARTER, Justice (concurring specially). I join in the court’s opinion in all aspects, except its treatment of the expert testimony of Lieutenant David Taylor. Although that testimony does not warrant reversal of Newell’s conviction, given the strength of other evidence against him, it should not have been allowed by the district court. The challenged testimony of Lieutenant Taylor explained t…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.