State v. Mughni

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1987-11-04

Cited by 114 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Douglas, J. The instant appeal poses to this court a single question: Are the offenses of which appellant was convicted allied offenses of similar import, such that appellant’s conviction of both counts was improper under R.C. 2941.25(A)? We answer this question in the negative. R.C. 2941.25 provides: “(A) Where the same conduct by defendant can be construed to constitute two or m…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.