State v. Martin

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 2004-10-27

Cited by 278 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J. {¶ 1} We are asked to decide what constitutes sufficient waiver of the accused’s right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Section 10, Article I of the Ohio Constitution. In this case, because we find that the accused essentially proceeded pro se, without being sufficiently warned of the dangers of self-representation and without properly waiving his right to couns…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.