State v. Mack

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1995-08-30

Cited by 119 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Wright, J., dissenting. I must respectfully dissent. I concur with the majority’s treatment of almost all of the alleged errors raised by appellant. For the most part, those propositions of law concern matters which were within the trial court’s discretion, were not raised in the court of appeals, or were otherwise waived by counsel for the appellant. However, the trial court’s refusal to allow Curtis Mack to…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.