State v. Luck

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1984-12-31

Cited by 230 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Sweeney, J. The central issue in this case is whether the trial court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment. The arguments of defendant’s counsel in support of the motion to dismiss are (1) that the fifteen-year delay between the commission of the offense and the defendant’s indictment therefor has deprived the defendant of her right to a speedy trial under the Ohio Constitution, and (2) that this del…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.