State v. Lorenz

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 2004-07-01

Cited by 137 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Ireland, J. In this case we consider whether the trial court erred when it refused to include in the “to convict” instruction a finding of sexual gratification for the crime of first degree child molestation. We also consider whether the trial court erred when it admitted petitioner Pamela Jean Lorenz’s written statement after ruling that Miranda 1 rights were not required because Lorenz was not in cust…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.