State v. Kyllo

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 2009-09-03

Cited by 678 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Madsen, J. ¶1 — The defendant maintains that trial counsel was ineffective because counsel misstated the law on self-defense in an instruction counsel proposed that was given to the jury and in statements made during closing argument about Kenneth Kyllo’s self-defense claim. We agree and accordingly reverse Mr. Kyllo’s conviction for second degree assault. We remand for retrial. FACTS ¶2 On…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.