State v. Kintz

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 2010-08-26

Cited by 189 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Alexander, J. ¶1 — Clarence Kintz obtained review of a decision of the Court of Appeals affirming his convictions in Whatcom County Superior Court on two charges of stalking. Kintz contends that the Court of Appeals erred by affirming the trial court’s interpretation of the term “separate occasions,” which appears in the stalking statute, RCW 9A.46.110. He also contends that the Court of Appeals incorrectly determined that suffic…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.