State v. James

Decided 1991-10-15

Cited by 163 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice (concurring and dissenting): I concur in the majority opinion except as to that portion of part II which holds that the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial based on the allegation that Ronald Peterson testified falsely at defendant’s trial. We held in State v. Gellatly, <span class="citation" data…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.