State v. Jackman

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 2006-04-13

Cited by 151 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

¶1 The State seeks reversal of a Court of Appeals decision holding that a reference to minor victims’ birth dates on 11 “to convict” jury instructions was prejudicial per se because the State was relieved of the burden of proving the element of the victims’ ages. The defendant, *739 Ryan Alan Jackman, cross-petitions for reversal of the court’s denial of his double jeopardy claim. In accordance wit…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.