State v. J.K. (In Re Interest of J.K.)

Decided 2018-07-13

Cited by 120 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Heavican, C.J., concurring. I concur with the decision of the court, but write separately to caution that a trial court should refrain as much as possible from calling and questioning witnesses on its own motion, particularly where that witness is one of the attorneys in the underlying litigation and especially where the trial court then subjected counsel to a leading question. Both Nebraska a…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.