FELDMAN, Chief Justice, dissenting. I fully concur in Justice Zlaket’s dissent and write separately only to argue for adoption of a prophylactic rule to ensure compliance with constitutional requirements. Once a defendant has raised a substantial question of compliance with constitutional requirements for issuance of a warrant, then, as Justice Zlaket suggests, the government must demonstrate…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.