State v. Hutton

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1990-08-08

Cited by 124 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

H. Brown, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in the syllabus .law, and in the majority’s holding that the defendant Hutton was properly convicted. However, because the sentencing phase of the trial was marred by a plain error in the jury instructions, I must respectfully dissent from the remand for review of the death sentence. A criminal defendant has a r…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.