State v. Hopson

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1989-09-14

Cited by 161 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Durham, J. (concurring)—I concur in the decision of the majority. I agree that appellant's right, guaranteed by the Washington Constitution to not be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense, was not violated in this case. I also agree that we need not decide in this case if the Washington Constitution provides more protection from double jeopardy than does the United States Constitution. Like most states…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.