¶1 Russell David Homan was convicted of child luring under Washington’s luring statute, RCW 9A- *104 .40.090. On appeal, Homan argued that his conviction violated his Fourteenth Amendment 1 right to due process because the evidence was insufficient for conviction and that ROW 9A.40.090 is unconstitutionally overbroad in violation of the First Amendment. 2</fo…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.