State v. Hochhausler

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1996-07-30

Cited by 178 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

F.E. Sweeney, J., concurs, except with paragraph three of the syllabus and the related discussion in the opinion, to which he dissents. Patton and Cook, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part. John T. Patton, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J. Diane Karpinski, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for Pfeifer,…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.