State v. Haynes

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1971-03-17

Cited by 246 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

O’Neill, C. J. Appellant basically raises two issues in this case. First, he contends that the affidavit for the search warrant did not set forth any grounds to show that the information furnished by the informer was reliable. The affidavit in the present case recited that, on three separate, designated occasions over a three-week period, a named informant purchased marijuana on the premises…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.