State v. Haselden

Decided 2003-03-28

Cited by 107 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice EDMUNDS dissenting. I dissent as to the majority’s holding that the trial court did not err in failing to intervene ex mero mo tu when the prosecutor made an *36 argument based upon the Bible. This Court has frequently expressed its disapproval of such arguments. We continue to hold that it is not so grossly imprope…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.