State v. Guzek

Decided 1995-11-24

Cited by 134 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

GRABER, J., dissenting. Because evidence of the victims’ character and background was admissible, I dissent. The majority distorts the applicable statutes and thereby thwarts the will of the people. PERTINENT TRIAL PROCEEDINGS Before the penalty phase of defendant’s trial began, defendant moved in limine to prevent the admission of so-called “victim impact” evidence…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.