Per Curiam. The sole inquiry presented by this cause is whether the trial court committed prejudicial error in excluding appellee’s proposed evidence of his prior sexual conduct with the victim. The question of the constitutionality of the statute is not before us. R. C, 2907.02(D) provides, in applicable part, that evidence of specific instances of the victim’s past sexual activity with the accus…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.