State v. Goodman

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 2004-01-15

Cited by 194 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Chambers, J. (concurring) — I fully concur with the majority. I write separately to clarify the scope of our holding. Adequate notice of the specific crime charged is an absolute requirement of law. U.S. Const. amend. VI; Wash. Const. art. I, § 22; see also State v. Vangerpen, <a href="/opinion/1347749/state-v-vangerpen/#787" aria-description="Citation for c…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.