State v. Gillard

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1988-12-30

Cited by 184 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Moyer, C.J. The state asserts six propositions of law and Gillard’s cross-appeal asserts two propositions of law. For the reasons that follow, we sustain the state’s propositions of law, overrule Gillard’s propositions of law, and reverse the judgment of the court of áppeals. I The state’s first proposition of law stems from a dispute over the procedures to be followed under Crim. R. 16(B)(1)(…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.