State v. Farris

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 2006-07-12

Cited by 172 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Alice Robie Resnick, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. {¶ 54} I concur with the majority’s finding that the appellant, Stephen F. Farris, was not unreasonably detained, that he was in custody when he made his pre-Miranda statements, and that his post-Miranda statements are inadmissible. However, I strongly disagree with the majority’s determinati…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.