State v. Fanning

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1982-07-14

Cited by 2,052 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Reilly, J. Appellant advances three propositions of law: 1. “It is a denial of due process of law for a trial court to overrule a motion *20 to suppress the in-court identification of the defendant and permit identification testimony, when the totality of the evidence establishes that the pre-trial, pre-line-up photographic identification procedure was so…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.