State v. Evans

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1992-03-11

Cited by 219 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. I Appellant alleges in his first proposition of law that the prosecution engaged in misconduct in the guilt and mitigation phases of the trial. A Appellant challenges the following comments by the prosecutor during his closing argument in the mitigation phase: “MR. HUDSON: * * * What do you think life imprisonment means? Twel…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.