O’Neitl, C. J. Appellant presents 12 assignments of error (hereinafter referred to as “propositions of law”). I. In his fourth proposition of law, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that the state had presented sufficient evidence to show the commission of an *34 aggravated robbery prior to the admission of the appel…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.