State v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1978-03-15

Cited by 165 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Celebrezze, J. Appellant contends that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that certain statements made by the victim to her mother, concerning the sexual conduct of the appellee, were inadmissible because they lacked the essential attributes of spontaneity. The record discloses that near the hour of 11:00 A. M., on Saturday, March 8, 1975, the victim was at home in her bedroom, watching television, while her…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.