State v. Dullard

Decided 2003-09-04

Cited by 111 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CARTER, Justice (dissenting). I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the court of appeals applied an improper standard in considering the motion for judgment of acquittal as if the hearsay statement had not been admitted into evidence. Such motions must be determined on the basis of the evidence that has been admitted rather than the evidence that should have been admitted. I disagree, however, with the co…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.