State v. Draggo

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1981-03-31

Cited by 151 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. I. Appellant, in his first proposition of law, asserts, in essence, that the trial court erred by not dismissing the case on his motion, since no action or activity of the appellant occurred in Franklin County. More narrowly stated, appellant asserts that any one of the eight southwestern counties, and not Franklin County, is the proper venue for this matter. <p "b1…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.