State v. Downey

Decided 2008-10-16

Cited by 103 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION MAES, Justice. {1} The question presented in this appeal is whether the trial court properly executed its gatekeeping function in determining that (1) the State’s witness, Ron Smock, was qualified to testify as an expert concerning the science of retrograde extrapolation; and (2) Smock’s expert tes…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.