State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 2000-09-28

Cited by 185 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Sanders, J. (dissenting) — I dissent for two reasons. First, as I read the record, the trial court erred in admitting the hearsay statement of George Anthony Wilson against Cecil Davis under the “excited utterance” exception to hearsay. Second, jury instruction 13, defining aggravators to first *889 degree murder, incorrectly allowed the jury to convict Davis of aggravated f…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.