State v. Darmond

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 2013-03-21

Cited by 384 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

[Cite as State v. Darmond, 135 Ohio St.3d 343, 2013-Ohio-966.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. DARMOND ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State v. Darmond, 135 Ohio St.3d 343, 2013-Ohio-966.] The holding in Lakewood v. Papadelis that “[a] trial court must inquire into the circumstances surrounding a discovery rule violation and, when deciding whether to impose a sanction, must impose the least severe sanction that is consistent with the purpose of the rules o…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.