*808 Dore, J. (dissenting)—The major issue of the subject appeal is whether the jury was properly instructed on insanity and, if not, whether this constituted prejudicial error. The majority, in affirming the trial court and the Court of Appeals, upholds the validity of instruction 10, instructing the jurors the defendant would be "insane" only if he could…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.