State v. Calle

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1995-01-26

Cited by 348 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Madsen, J. At issue in this case is whether the Defendant’s convictions for first degree incest and second degree rape violate the Fifth Amendment’s protection against double jeopardy because they arose from a single act of intercourse. Facts James Calle, hereafter referred to as the Defendant, was originally charged with committing…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.