State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 2002-12-23

Cited by 211 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Pfeifer, J. {¶ 1} Appellant, Anthony David Brown, contends that his counsel was ineffective because counsel did not assert that Brown’s right to a speedy trial had been *122 violated. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that Brown’s counsel was not ineffective and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. {¶ 2} On June 16, 2000, a grand jury…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.