State v. Brown

Decided 1984-04-03

Cited by 307 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice EXUM dissenting in part. I dissent from that portion of the majority’s decision which holds that it was not error to permit the state to put before the jury on cross-examination of the witness Waller that defendant was “on parole for sale of the controlled substance heroin and two counts of possession of the controlled substance heroin.” The majority correctly notes that ordinarily this evidence would…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.